News & Milestones
Tightened rules for the “whiplash business” since 2009
By Rolf P. Steinegger
Requirements for proof of natural causality became stricter. Accident and biomechanical expert opinions could be presented as evidence.
Non-objectifiable health impairments generally did not result in long-term restricted employment disability.
Working paper "Tightened rules for the whiplash business" of
26.04.2011.
» To article
The "whiplash business", Reply to the article: "When officials diagnose" by
David Husmann, Bund of 05.03.2011, in Der Bund of 17.03.2011, 15.
»
To article
Tightened rules for "whiplash business" – strong headwind or slipstream, in
HAVE 4/2010, 402 f.
» To article
Disruption in the health industry, in BernerZeitung BZ online of
25.09.2010.
» To article
Almost no disability pension for whiplash, in BernerZeitung BZ of
14.09.2010,
1 and 3.
» To
article
Federal Court takes on whiplash business, in BernerZeitung BZ online of
06.07.2010.
» To article
Ulrich Meyer, Whiplash from a different angle, in Festschrift für
(celebration publication in honour of) Erwin Murer, 2010, available at Verlag
Stämpfli AG Bern.
» To article